Posts

Hong Kong Barrister Napoleon Wong Prosecuted For Misconduct - SKA v TI [2023] HKFC 176 黃祖毅大律師專業失當

Hong Kong Barrister Napoleon Wong Prosecuted For Misconduct - SKA v TI [2023] HKFC 176 黃祖毅大律師專業失當 -  https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=155148&currpage=T https://alscchambers.blogspot.com/2026/04/hongkongbarrister-lawyer-counsel-napolonewong-misconduct.html “I noticed Counsel Mr Napoleon Wong was absent from the Bar Table in the morning of the 3rd day of trial on 4/8/2023. It was not until my enquiry with Counsel Mr Ken Lee when I was told Counsel Mr Napoleon Wong could not attend the hearing in the morning but would be back in the afternoon. In the afternoon, I noticed Counsel Mr Napoleon Wong appeared at the Bar Table sitting next to Counsel Mr Ken Lee but without a single word or apology for the “sudden and unexplained” absence in that morning. Given his name was provided as one of the Counsel for M, and not a pupil barrister or a trainee solicitor attending the trial, he was expected to show courteous and be respectful to the Court... I look...

Cheung Yan & Associates Solicitor Desmond Cheung Sued By Other Lawyers 張德民律師俾法律界行家告 - HCA2413/2018 - Next Hearing on 16 March 2026 (60 Minutes Reserved)

Cheung Yan & Associates Solicitor Desmond Cheung Sued By Other Lawyers 張德民律師俾法律界行家告 - HCA2413/2018 - Next Hearing on 16 March 2026 (60 Minutes Reserved)  https:// hongkonglawyer2026.blogspot. com/2026/01/solicitor-desmond- cheung-sued-by-other-lawyers- in-hongkong-in-hca2413-2018. html?m=1 Lam Siu Sun Dennis v Cheung Tak Man Desmond [2022] HKCFI 78 - “3.  In this action, serious allegations are made by the plaintiffs against the 1st defendant, including unauthorised transfers out of client account to the 1st defendant’s personal accounts from 2008 to 2016. The plaintiffs also allege that in June 2016, the 1st defendant signed 172 bills which were falsified and were never sent to the clients and that based on these bills, cheques were drawn on the client account and eventually transferred to the 1st defendant. Lastly, there is also an allegation that the 1st defendant played a part in certain secret profit-sharing arrangement involving other defendants and that was in breac...

Hong Kong Barrister Wing So Prosecuted For AOABH in Criminal Court - 蘇潁大律師被控襲擊致造成身體傷害罪 - ESCC299/2026

Hong Kong Barrister Wing So Prosecuted For AOABH in Criminal Court - 蘇潁大律師被控襲擊致造成身體傷害罪 - ESCC299/2026 #WingSo # 蘇潁大律師 https://thewitnesshk.com/%E5% A4%A7%E5%BE%8B%E5%B8%AB%E6%B6% 89%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E4%BB%94% E6%8E%A8%E8%B7%8C%E5%89%8D%E5% A5%B3%E5%8F%8B-%E8%A2%AB%E6% 8E%A7%E8%A5%B2%E6%93%8A-%E5% 87%86%E4%BF%9D%E9%87%8B%E5%80% 99%E8%A8%8A/ https://www.facebook.com/ share/16WGKCdmLk/?mibextid= wwXIfr

Barrister Leon Chan of Lawrence Lok SC’s Chambers Sued By SG Girl So Funny! 駱應淦御用資深大律師辦事處陳卓軒大律師俾新加坡女仔告好Q好笑!

Barrister Leon Chan of Lawrence Lok SC’s Chambers Sued By SG Girl So Funny!   駱應淦御用資深大律師辦事處 陳卓軒大律師俾 新加坡女仔告好Q好 笑! # 陳卓軒 #LeonChan # 駱應淦 https:// gettingjusticeinhongkong. blogspot.com/2019/05/krislyn- ng-sues-barrister-leon-chan- of-lawrence-lok-scs-chambers- so-funny.html?m=1 不堪恐嚇迫婚煎熬 星女與父母入稟向實習大律師索償 來自新加坡的一家三口昨入稟區域法院控告一名男實習大律師迫婚, 三人指控他不斷恐嚇及中傷他們一家, 更曾在醉酒狀態以訊息強迫女事主答應其求婚, 並四圍向事主朋友散播不實謠言,令他們一家飽受心理及精神煎熬, 事主父母希望說服他離開其女兒亦不果, 故一同入稟冀法官為他們受到的心靈損失對男子作出懲罰以儆效尤。 原告分別為Krislyn Jiaqian Ng,James Yew Chye Ng,Wendi Kwee Guan Tan;被告為 Chan Leon Cheuk Hin (中文名字:陳卓軒)。 根據互聯網資料顯示, 被告於2019年3月起在香港中環都爹利街6號 印刷行10樓任職實習大律師。 http://hd.stheadline.com/news/ realtime/hk/1448250/ 

Martin Lee SC is a Disgusting Criminal who should be struck off the role of Barristers! 李柱銘資深大律師係已被定罪罪犯應該要俾香港大律師公會釘牌啦!

Martin Lee SC is a Disgusting Criminal who should be struck off the role of Barristers! 李柱銘資深大律師係已被定罪罪犯應該要俾香港大律師公會釘牌啦!

蕭震然大律師俾香港大律師公會釘牌45個月 - Hong Kong Barrister Devin Sio Convicted of Misconduct and Suspended for 45 Months!

蕭震然大律師俾香港大律師公會釘牌45個月 - Hong Kong Barrister Devin Sio Convicted of Misconduct and Suspended for 45 Months! 前青年民建聯副主席、「熊貓大狀」大律師蕭震然,早前處理一宗民事索償案,被投訴專業失當,又涉於另一事件接受紀律聆訊時提供假資料。據悉,大律師公會經調查後,周五(18 日)向會員發信,指蕭面對的 3 項投訴全部成立,被罰停牌共 45 個月,另須賠償當事人、繳罰款及聆訊費合共接近 45 萬元。信中提及,蕭震然的專業失當,對程序公義有不利影響,另批評他在聆訊中提供不實資訊,以誤導他所屬的專業組織,是在玩「貓戲老鼠」的把戲(playing cat-and-mouse)。 該 3 項對蕭震然的投訴分別為: (一)蕭在一宗 2017 年民事索償案中,代表原告人時專業失當; (二)蕭 2016 年時,以專業身分造訪某律師家中就案件開會,而非辦公室; (三)蕭 2020 年接受紀律審裁組聆訊時提供失實資料。 大律師公會將投訴轉介大律師紀律審裁組進行研訊。據了解,審裁組審議後,裁定 3 項對蕭的投訴均成立,並就首項投訴判蕭停牌 30 個月,須於 120 天內向原告賠償 39,500 元,亦即原告聘請他的律師費;就次項投訴,對蕭予以譴責,他須於 120 天內就違例罰款 2,500 元;至於第 3 項投訴,則罰停牌 15 個月,與首項投訴分期執行。此外,蕭須向大律師公會繳聆訊費約 406,800 元。 蕭對第一項投訴作出求情,指他失去所有工作委託、陷經濟困難,現靠家人財政支援維生,望給予他較長時間繳款。其餘兩投訴則沒求情。審裁組批蕭就另外兩項投訴,沒歉意或悔意,也沒表示將來如何不會重複犯錯。 https://thewitnesshk.com/%e7%86%8a%e8%b2%93%e5%a4%a7%e7%8b%80%e8%95%ad%e9%9c%87%e7%84%b6%e6%b6%89%e5%b0%88%e6%a5%ad%e5%a4%b1%e7%95%b6-%e5%a4%a7%e5%be%8b%e5%b8%ab%e5%85%ac%e6%9c%83%e6%8c%873%e6%8a%95%e8%a8%b4%e6%88%90%e7%ab%8b/ By Statement of Findin...