Posts

Complaint Against Hong Kong Barrister Dorothy Cheung (張曉惠大律師) of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong

This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 1.  The applicant Ma Ka Kin was originally jointly charged with one Hung Chi Him (“Ah Him”) with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug (1,185 grammes of cocaine).  The charge was amended, leaving the applicant facing the charge alone.  The applicant pleaded guilty on 28 August 2017 to the amended charge before a Magistrate and was committed to the CFI of the High Court for sentence. 2.  ...

Complaint Against Hong Kong Barrister Douglas Kwok (郭憬憲大律師) of Wong Man Kit SC's Chambers - 香港特別行政區 訴 吳銘揚 (07/05/2021, HCMA197/2020) [2021] HKCFI 1259

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barrister Douglas Kwok ( 郭憬憲大律師 ) of Wong Man Kit SC's Chambers, Suites 902-905, Bank of America Tower, 12 Harcourt Rd, Central, H.K., for his blatant breach of  paragraphs 10.29 & 10.30 of the Bar Code , in that he has failed to act with candour and independence in the interests of justice, and  knowingly deceived or misled the Court , when making a mitigation speech at Eastern Magistrates' Courts (ESCC 2524/2019).  Alternatively, he was incompetent in his professional activities, and breached  paragraphs 4.1 (d) of the Bar Code  in the same matter. The material facts had been set out by Madam Justice Maggie Poon in  香港特別行政區   訴   吳銘揚  (07/05/2021, HCMA197/2020) [2021] HKCFI 1259:    https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=135596&currpage=T   "50.   從上述原訟法庭法官處理擔保的謄本可見, 在原審裁判官席前的確出現她所指的曾被「 一...

Formal Complaint Against DVC Barrister Barry Barlow SC - HCA 492 / 2020 [2021] HKCFI 1040 (08/04/2021)

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barrister Mr Barry Barlow SC  of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K. ., for his blatant breach of  paragraphs 4.1(b)(ii), 4.1(b)(iii), 4.1(c), 4.1(d) & 10.34 of the Bar Code , in that he had, in handling a simple application to amend a Defence to add a Counterclaim, completely failed to act competently, in that (1) he did not know the amendment should be done in the red colour pursuant to paragraph 2 of Practice Direction 19.1; (2) he did not know the Court's leave was required because pleadings were closed; and (3) he did not know it should be done by way of inter parte summons, instead of ex parte. Mr Barry Barlow SC's ignorance in relation to this was worse than a PCLL student in a moot.  He was flagrantly incompetent and obviously so.  As a result of his flagrant incompetence, his client, Haldanes, had been ordered to...

Hong Kong Barrister James H M McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Ordered to Pay Wasted Costs in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189

Wasted Costs Order Against Hong Kong Barrister James H M McGowan of Admiralty Chambers - HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189 https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T 36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct. 47.  Whatever the position may have been in respect of funding, the applicant was legally aided as from 17 August 2018. There can be no excuse for either Mr Mohnani or Mr McGowan failing to comply with the Court's directions thereafter and no conceivable justification for allowing 7 months to go by from 12 September 2018 (the granting of yet another 21-day extension) until Mr McGowan's plea to be allowed to argue Ground 5 of...

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors)

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors) I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barristers Dr William Wong SC and Michael Lok of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.., for their blatant breach of  paragraphs 4.1(b)(ii), 4.1(b)(iii), 4.1(c) & 10.34 of the Bar Code , in that they had, when appearing before DHCJ Winnie Tsui in April 2021 as professional advocates for the trial of HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors), knowingly double-booked themselves, and then knowingly did not show up in court, without any prior approval of the court, and without even having first informed the court, thereby showing their utterly disgusting disrespect towards the court, resul...

Formal Complaint Against Barrister Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barrister  Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K. ., for his blatant breach of  paragraphs 10.29 & 10.30 of the Bar Code , in that he has failed to act with candour and independence in the interests of justice, and  knowingly deceived or misled the Court , in his ex parte Court Application before  DHCJ MK Liu  on  18 February 2021.  Alternatively, he was incompetent in his professional activities, and breached   paragraphs 4.1 (d) of the Bar Code  in the same matter. The material facts had been set out in  [2021] HKCFI 836 ( HCMP 2178/2020)  -  https://legalref. judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_ frame.jsp?DIS=134766&currpage= T   - where Coleman J said these about Barrister Gary CC Lam's conduct, behaviour and performance   in his ex parte Court Application bef...

Formal Complaint Against Barrister Martin Lee SC (李柱銘資深大律師) of 704A, Tower 1, Admiralty Centre, 18 Harcourt Rd, Admiralty, Hong Kong

This is a formal complaint against Barrister Martin Lee SC (李柱銘資深大律師) of 704A, Tower 1, Admiralty Centre, 18 Harcourt Rd, Admiralty, Hong Kong,  for his obvious breach of  Paragraph 4.1(b)(ii) of the Bar Code , in that he had committed the crimes of  [1] Organizing an unauthorized assembly;  and [2] Knowingly taking part in an unauthorized assembly , and was thereafter on 1 April 2021 duly convicted as a criminal by  Her Honour Judge Woodcock in DCCC 536/2020 [2021] HKDC 398.  His  disgusting criminal activity and subsequent conviction had been widely reported in the press.  He had therefore by his own disgusting criminal activity brought the Bar into disrepute. See:  https://legalref. judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_ frame.jsp?DIS=134671&currpage= T See:  https://www.scmp.com/ news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/ article/3127881/hong-kong- protests-jimmy-lai-and-six-ex- lawmakers   As a barrister admitted in Hong Kong in 1966, Mr M...