Complaint Against Useless Hong Kong Barrister Albert N B Wong (黃雅斌大律師) of Bernacchi Chambers

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Useless Hong Kong Barrister Albert N B Wong (黃雅斌大律師) of Bernacchi Chambers for his blatant breach of paragraphs 4.1 & 10.5 of the Bar Code, in that he had, in handling a simple District Court Civil Action (DCCJ 1719 / 2019), completely failed to appreciate (a) that after an unless order had been made against his lay client, it was never up to his lay client, or his instructing solicitors, or himself, to choose to ignore or disobey it without applying for a stay, and without applying for relief against sanction; and (b) that breaching an unless order would result in default judgement being entered against his lay client, namely, former deputy special magistrate Ho Lai Ming.  


Barrister Albert N B Wong's flagrant incompetence resulted in a default judgement being entered against his lay client, namely, former deputy special magistrate Ho Lai Ming.  It also resulted in a public judgement being handed down by HHJ Herbert Au-Yeung ([2021] HKDC 1362), which was in turn widely reported in the press.  He had brought the Bar into disrepute.  See: -

https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=139794&currpage=T


https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20211101/bkn-20211101193342563-1101_00822_001.html

https://www.hk01.com/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E/695798/%E4%B8%8D%E5%B0%8F%E5%BF%83%E9%81%8E%E9%A6%AC%E8%B7%AF%E6%A1%88-%E5%A5%B3%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%89%E5%A6%82%E5%BB%81%E9%81%B2%E5%88%B0%E8%A2%AB%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82%E4%BA%A4%E4%BF%9D%E9%87%8B%E9%87%91-%E6%84%9F%E5%8F%97%E5%89%B5%E7%B4%A2%E5%84%9F%E5%8B%9D%E8%A8%B4

前暫委特委裁判官何麗明，早前處理一宗尼泊爾籍女保安涉不小心過馬路案審逾一年，該女保安稱審訊期間曾因如廁遲到1分鐘，之後被何官要求交出保釋金100元，女保安認為何官做法錯誤，令她情感受到傷害，入稟索償170萬元。區域法院法官就女保安的索償案下判辭，指代表何官的律政司未有依法庭規定在指定期限交答辯書，直接裁定女保安勝訴，賠償金額則有待評核。

法官強調，是否跟從法庭命令，非由律政司自行決定，本案中律政司違反法庭命令，是故意和傲慢。由於法官認為律政司要求剔除案件的理據並不成立，律政司在沒有依令呈交抗辯書的情況下， 法官最終直接判Thapa Kamala勝訟，但賠償額則有待評核。

案件編號：DCCJ1719/2019

Please prosecute Useless Hong Kong Barrister Albert N B Wong (黃雅斌大律師) of Bernacchi Chambers for professional misconduct accordingly.  He is a cancer cell.  He is a risk to all litigants.  He should be struck off the Roll of Barristers immediately.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Formal Complaint Against Barrister Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barrister  Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K. ., for his blatant breach of  paragraphs 10.29 & 10.30 of the Bar Code , in that he has failed to act with candour and independence in the interests of justice, and  knowingly deceived or misled the Court , in his ex parte Court Application before  DHCJ MK Liu  on  18 February 2021.  Alternatively, he was incompetent in his professional activities, and breached   paragraphs 4.1 (d) of the Bar Code  in the same matter. The material facts had been set out in  [2021] HKCFI 836 ( HCMP 2178/2020)  -  https://legalref. judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_ frame.jsp?DIS=134766&currpage= T   - where Coleman J said these about Barrister Gary CC Lam's conduct, behaviour and performance   in his ex parte Court Application before  DHCJ MK Liu  on  18 February 2021: - 1. If there were a prize to be awarded to t
Read more

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠!

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠! https://hklawyers2022.blogspot.com/2022/03/garden-chambers-barrister-dorothy.html This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 首被告陳強利（58歲、退休人士）今天透過代表大律師，申請暫毋須答辯，以待進一步索取控方未被使用文件；陳今天沒有保釋申請。控方則回應指，相關文件會在一星期內交給辯方。次被告張曉惠（33歲、大律師）的代表大律師則表示張已經準備好答辯，但得悉陳仍須索取文件，故保留答辯。法官高勁修問及張的意向，辯方透露張擬不認罪。控罪指，2名被告於2017年1月27日至2017年11月21日期間的若干日子，在香港與馬家健和其他人一同串謀妨礙司法公正，即就刑事案件TWCC 2496/2016，虛假地表示洪智謙沒有要求馬家健接收上述相關案件的郵包，以及聲稱洪智謙並不涉及於上述相關案件。 案件編號：DCCC 37/2022 htt
Read more

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors)

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors) I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barristers Dr William Wong SC and Michael Lok of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.., for their blatant breach of  paragraphs 4.1(b)(ii), 4.1(b)(iii), 4.1(c) & 10.34 of the Bar Code , in that they had, when appearing before DHCJ Winnie Tsui in April 2021 as professional advocates for the trial of HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors), knowingly double-booked themselves, and then knowingly did not show up in court, without any prior approval of the court, and without even having first informed the court, thereby showing their utterly disgusting disrespect towards the court, resulting in their admission
Read more