Paul Harris SC of Denis Chang’s Chambers Suspected of Having Acted in Breach of Chinese National Security Laws - Cautioned Statement Taken by Hong Kong Police on 1 March 2022

Paul Harris SC of Denis Chang’s Chambers Suspected of Having Acted in Breach of Chinese National Security Laws - Cautioned Statement Taken by Hong Kong Police on 1 March 2022

香港文匯報記者齊正之、張得民報道：昨晚（3月1日）7時半左右，香港文匯報記者發現夏博義現身香港機場，只見他帶備大量行李，懷疑是早有準備。

在開始機場辦理登機手續前，他似乎因證件資料問題難以完成登機手續，之後，他再轉往機場服務櫃台與服務人員理論。據了解，夏博義是乘搭土耳其航空深夜11點的航機離港飛赴土耳其，再轉往英國。

至晚上9時許，兩名疑似其家庭成員走進他身旁，據悉，女的是夏的華藉太太，男的則是他兒子。至9時半左右，夏博義再次排隊辦理登機手續，在10時左右登機手續完成後，他與家人急步前往機場禁區準備出境。

香港文匯報記者上前追問他，為何走得那麼匆忙？是否怕香港警方拘捕他?是否擔心香港國安法？但夏博義均未回答，並急步衝進機場禁區。

當日上午11時，夏博義曾前往灣仔警察總部，據了解，夏博義涉嫌違反香港國安法被警方國安處警誡會面，會面中被要求交代涉嫌違反國家安全的行為等。

https://www.wenweipo.com/a/202203/02/AP621e43b5e4b036dce998c877.html

據了解，香港大律師公會前主席夏博義被警方國安處警誡會面，他沒有被捕，已離開警署。據知他被要求交代涉及違反《港區國安法》的行為。消息指，案件與夏博義創立的民間團體「香港人權監察」有關。就今次事件，警方發言人回覆東網指，警方採取任何行動，會按實際情況，依法處理，不會就個別情況作出評論。 今早（1日）約11時，夏博義到達灣仔警察總部，同行者還有2名西裝男子。約2個半小時後，夏博義一行人離開，據悉他當時面露憔悴，低頭急步離去。

https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20220301/mobile/bkn-20220301155820544-0301_00822_001.html

消息指前任大律師公會主席夏博義（Paul Harris），涉嫌違反國安法，被警方國安處要求協助調查。今早（1日）11時許，他由兩名身穿西裝的男子陪同前往灣仔警察總部，逗留兩個多小時後離開，其間未有回應傳媒提問。消息指，案件與夏博義創立的民間團體「香港人權監察」有關，他涉嫌違反香港國安法被警方國安處警誡會面，會面中被要求交代涉嫌違反國家安全的行為等。

https://www.hk01.com/突發/741704/前大律師公會主席夏博義涉違國安法-赴警總國安處警誡會面

Ex-Hong Kong Bar Association chief Paul Harris meets national security police to ‘assist with investigation’

Harris went to police headquarters by appointment on Tuesday and took a cautioned statement, a police source says, adding no arrest was made

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3168806/ex-hong-kong-bar-association-chief-paul-harris-meets

Former Bar Association chairman Paul Harris was questioned by police on Tuesday in a national security investigation.

Harris arrived at the Police Headquarters in Wan Chai at around 11am. He left the police station after staying two hours, after which he declined to answer reporters' questions.

Harris was questioned for his involvement in the Hong Kong Human Rights 
Monitor - a human rights group founded by him, according to sources.

The Bar Association told The Standard on Tuesday that they are looking into the matter and will not comment at this stage.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Formal Complaint Against Barrister Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.

I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barrister  Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K. ., for his blatant breach of  paragraphs 10.29 & 10.30 of the Bar Code , in that he has failed to act with candour and independence in the interests of justice, and  knowingly deceived or misled the Court , in his ex parte Court Application before  DHCJ MK Liu  on  18 February 2021.  Alternatively, he was incompetent in his professional activities, and breached   paragraphs 4.1 (d) of the Bar Code  in the same matter. The material facts had been set out in  [2021] HKCFI 836 ( HCMP 2178/2020)  -  https://legalref. judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_ frame.jsp?DIS=134766&currpage= T   - where Coleman J said these about Barrister Gary CC Lam's conduct, behaviour and performance   in his ex parte Court Application before  DHCJ MK Liu  on  18 February 2021: - 1. If there were a prize to be awarded to t
Read more

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠!

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠! https://hklawyers2022.blogspot.com/2022/03/garden-chambers-barrister-dorothy.html This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 首被告陳強利（58歲、退休人士）今天透過代表大律師，申請暫毋須答辯，以待進一步索取控方未被使用文件；陳今天沒有保釋申請。控方則回應指，相關文件會在一星期內交給辯方。次被告張曉惠（33歲、大律師）的代表大律師則表示張已經準備好答辯，但得悉陳仍須索取文件，故保留答辯。法官高勁修問及張的意向，辯方透露張擬不認罪。控罪指，2名被告於2017年1月27日至2017年11月21日期間的若干日子，在香港與馬家健和其他人一同串謀妨礙司法公正，即就刑事案件TWCC 2496/2016，虛假地表示洪智謙沒有要求馬家健接收上述相關案件的郵包，以及聲稱洪智謙並不涉及於上述相關案件。 案件編號：DCCC 37/2022 htt
Read more

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors)

Complaint Against DVC Barristers Dr William Wong SC & Michael Lok - Double Booking Themselves & Knowingly Did Not Show Up In Court Without Prior Permission Of The Court - DHCJ Winnie Tsui - HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors) I am lodging a formal complaint, as a member of the public, against Hong Kong Barristers Dr William Wong SC and Michael Lok of Des Voeux Chambers, 38/F, Gloucester Tower, The Landmark, Central, H.K.., for their blatant breach of  paragraphs 4.1(b)(ii), 4.1(b)(iii), 4.1(c) & 10.34 of the Bar Code , in that they had, when appearing before DHCJ Winnie Tsui in April 2021 as professional advocates for the trial of HCA 2562/2014 (Lau Wing Yan and Ors v Chu Kong and Ors), knowingly double-booked themselves, and then knowingly did not show up in court, without any prior approval of the court, and without even having first informed the court, thereby showing their utterly disgusting disrespect towards the court, resulting in their admission
Read more